It’s difficult, in fact, to argue with any of Boyd’s conclusions. But if one can’t argue with a review, why bother with it at all? One would rather — at least, I would rather — read a striking if ultimately dubious argument about a book or a movie than the level-headed evaluations provided in these pages. It is more important for a critic to be interesting than to be right. To truly interest the reader, a critic must risk something and be prepared for the embarrassment that follows a questionable enthusiasm or the contrition that’s the result of an ill-considered pan.
from Slate, the London Review of Books, Bookforum, The Awl, New York Magazine, and elsewhere
Friday, December 07, 2007
The Polite Company of William Boyd
In this Sunday's New York Times Book Review, I review William Boyd's Bamboo: Essays and Criticism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)